دسته‌بندی نشده

  • Stick-shifted 1986 Jeep Cherokee shows where crossovers come from

    Stick-shifted 1986 Jeep Cherokee shows where crossovers come from

    We have the original Jeep Cherokee to thank (or blame) for the crossover’s rise. Released for 1984, and called XJ internally, the model gained a loyal following by bridging the gap between family-friendly station wagons and burly body-on-frame SUVs. Many early XJs were driven into the ground, heavily modified, or chewed alive by rust, but a clean-looking example with cool options has popped up on Cars & Bids.

    Jeep may have drawn inspiration from existing four-wheel-drive cars when it started developing the XJ. Subaru had offered wagons with four-wheel-drive for years, and American Motors Corporation (AMC), which Jeep was part of, had managed to carve out a niche for the four-wheel-drive Eagle wagon. Regardless, the idea was to downsize the Wagoneer-derived Cherokee into a more daily-drivable vehicle without losing off-road capability. The brand notably shifted away from body-on-frame construction and created a new architecture called Uniframe.

    By downsized, we mean downsized. The original, Wagoneer-based Cherokee measured 183.5 inches long, 75.6 inches wide, and 65.9 inches tall, and it weighed 3,764 pounds. The XJ Cherokee posted numbers of about 165, 70, and 63, respectively, and it tipped the scale at approximately 2,900 pounds. It was available with two or four doors (most of its rivals were two-door-only), which made it well-suited to family-hauling duties. Jeep’s paid bet off: The XJ-generation Cherokee nearly doubled the brand’s sales about a year after it went on sale.

    The example listed on Cars & Bids is the Pioneer model, which was positioned a notch above the base trim in 1986. It’s finished in Olympic White with a blue cloth interior, it’s riding on body-colored 15-inch steel wheels, and it was ordered with swing-away spare tire carrier that Jeep offered as an option on early models. It’s nearly unmodified and it appears to be in fairly good shape for an off-roader that’s quickly approaching its 40th birthday. Effortlessly rugged, it perfectly illustrates what the term “SUV” meant to many drivers in the middle of the 1980s, and it will certainly strike your nostalgia chord if you spent any amount of time in the nation’s mountainous regions in the 1990s.

    Jeep buyers had three engine options to choose from in 1986. The base engine was a 2.5-liter four-cylinder rated at 117 horsepower and 135 pound-feet of torque. From there, customers could take the XJ in two wildly different directions. One option was a 2.1-liter turbodiesel four-cylinder borrowed from Renault (remember: AMC was under French control for years) and tuned to develop 85 horsepower and 132 pound-feet of torque. Alternatively, a General Motors-sourced 2.8-liter V6 rated at 115 horsepower and 150 pound-feet of torque was offered.

    (Yes, the four-cylinder made more horsepower than the six. This was the 1980s; ’nuff said).

    The 1986 example on Cars & Bids is powered by the six-cylinder, which is widely considered to be the more desirable of the three options. The output reaches the rear or the four wheels through a five-speed manual transmission and a two-speed transfer case. Here again, this is how you’d want to configure one of these. The other transmission options for 1986 were a four-speed stick and a three-speed automatic.

    Jeep made numerous changes to the XJ-generation Cherokee during a production run that ended in 2001. The famous 4.0-liter straight-six replaced the 2.8-liter V6 for 1987, and the 1997 model year brought a new look that the Cherokee wore until it retired — in the United States, at least. Production continued in China into the 2010s. While the XJ was showing its age in the latter years of its American life, it remained a reasonably popular entry into a segment it helped create, and the nameplate was part of Jeep’s portfolio through the 2023 model year.

    Bidding on the 1986 currently stands at $1,155 with six days left in a seven-day auction, so there’s plenty of time for that figure to rise. And, this is a no-reserve auction so the highest bidder will take home a cool and relatively early example of one of Jeep’s most influential models.

     

  • Lotus Eletre will land at U.S. dealers starting at $107,000

    ·

    Lotus Eletre will land at U.S. dealers starting at $107,000

    Lotus Eletre will land at U.S. dealers starting at $107,000

    Lotus is ready to serve U.S. shoppers holding out for the Eletre SUV. The battery-electric family ride comes in two flavors for our market, entry-level and R, both in dual-motor configuration powered by a 111.9-kWh battery and 800-volt architecture for primo fast-charging performance. The mid-range Eletre S available in some markets is skipping the U.S., likely because luxury makers focus on a stout level of standard kit for our buyers, and work up from there. The prices before destination:

    • Eletre: $107,000
    • Eletre R: $145,000

    The former makes a combined 603 horsepower and 710 pound-feet of torque, able to hustle its roughly 5,500-pound heft from standstill to 62 miles per hour in 4.5 seconds and on to a top speed of 160 mph. The latter makes a combined 905 hp and 985 lb-ft., goading its roughly 5,820 pounds to 62 mph in 2.95 seconds, terminal velocity slightly up at 165 mph. When a driver needs to scrub off all that speed, the base model gets six-piston calipers clamping the front discs, the R gets 10-piston calipers. The minimum spec includes seven configurable interior screens, KEF audio, an adaptive suspension, and an ADAS suite powered by Nvidia chips processing information from 12 cameras, 18 radar units, and four LIDAR arrays.

    We wrote in our First Drive, “After a couple days behind the wheel of the Lotus Eletre, we’re left with almost as many questions as we started with.” This pricing only adds another layer of intrigue. The Lotus becomes the third sports-focused SUV in this broad MSRP segment, joining the Porsche Macan 4 EV ($79,000 to $105,300) and the Maserati Grecale Folgore (no official price yet, but around $110,000), or the fifth competitor if you want to include the Audi Q8 Sportback E-Tron ($94,000 to $100,000) and the truly dark horse Genesis Electrified GV70 ($68,000 to $75,000). The rest of the meager competition at the moment is either focused on luxury or off-road capability, that being the Mercedes-EQS SUV ($106,000 to $181,000), Hummer EV SUV ($96,550 to $140,295) and the Rivian R1S ($74,900 to $92,000). Lucid’s expected to join this club before the year is out with the Gravity. Early 2025 is going to see some highly anticipated comparison tests.

  • Driving the Cadillac Lyriq, Hyundai Santa Fe and a bunch of Lucid Airs | Autoblog Podcast #828

    Driving the Cadillac Lyriq, Hyundai Santa Fe and a bunch of Lucid Airs | Autoblog Podcast #828

    In this episode of the Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Road Test Editor Zac Palmer. The two kick things off with a loaded review section, starting with the 2024 Cadillac Lyriq Sport 3 then moving along to the 2024 Hyundai Santa Fe Calligraphy. After that, they dig into the Lucid Air lineup, as Zac just returned from a week at Lucid HQ driving all of the Air models. They wrap up the review section by digging into what they think of our long-term Mazda CX-90 PHEV’s powertrain. This week’s news includes discussion about Ford’s 60th Anniversary Mustang, the Tesla Cybertruck’s accelerator pedal issues and GM’s move away from the Renaissance Center. Lastly, the two spend a listener’s money.

    Send us your questions for the Mailbag and Spend My Money at: [email protected].

    Autoblog Podcast #828

    Get The Podcast

    • Apple Podcasts – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes
    • Spotify – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast on Spotify
    • RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator
    • MP3 – Download the MP3 directly

    Rundown

    • Cars we’re driving
    • News
    • Spend my money

    Feedback

    Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or “Alexa, open Autoblog” to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives.

    Related video:

  • Tesla Cybertruck Slippery Pedal Recall Caused By Soap

    ·

    Tesla Cybertruck Slippery Pedal Recall Caused By Soap

    Tesla Cybertruck hauling a get engine

    Image: Tesla

    Tesla issued a recall for every single Cybertruck built thus far, as well as a stop-sale that lasted nearly a week, and it’s something that can’t be solved with an over-the-air update. Apparently assembly line workers used slippery soap to get the truck’s throttle pedal pad onto the pedal, and leftover soap was causing the pad to slip off and get stuck at wide open throttle. Thankfully the truck cuts acceleration when you press the brake pedal, so hopefully there weren’t any injuries caused as a result of the issue. Regardless, Tesla is currently trying to figure out a fix for the pedal slip off, up to and including affixing the cover with additional hardware.

    dangerous problem with my Cybertruck

    The cause of the issue, as described by Tesla to the NHTSA:

    An unapproved change introduced lubricant (soap) to aid in the component assembly of the pad onto the accelerator pedal. Residual lubricant reduced the retention of the pad to the pedal.

    Who among us could have predicted such an issue?

    Going back to the drawing board, Tesla says it will “at no charge to the customer,” replace the accelerator pedal “such that the assembly meets specifications and ensures sufficient retention force between the pad and accelerator pedal to prevent the pad from dislodging.”

    According to The Autopian, Tesla’s fix seems to have been simply affixing the pedal pad to the pedal with a rivet. This wouldn’t be the first time Tesla has simply gone to the hardware store to fix its cars before delivery. It seems pretty par for the course considering the company built cars in a tent.

    Tesla says it is not aware of any accidents caused by the slipped throttle pedal pad, though it might help explain some.

  • مردی بعد از اینکه سوار ماشین خودش شد از خودش شکایت کرد

    علیرغم اینکه چقدر آنها را دوست داریم، ماشین ها مردم را وادار به انجام کارهای احمقانه می کنند. چه از روی میل باشد اضافه پرداخت برای بودن آنها در حین رانندگی بی خبر، اتومبیل ها می توانند به بدترین شکل بر قضاوت تأثیر بگذارند. وسیله نقلیه تصادفات واقعاً می تواند احمقانه را در مردم نشان دهد. در این داستان عجیبی که نزدیک به 20 سال پیش با آن مواجه شدم، مردی را که پس از تصادف سعی کرد از خود شکایت کند، در نظر بگیرید.

    کورتیس گوکی هم ساکن و هم راننده کامیون کمپرسی در شهر لودی، کالیفرنیا، یک شهر کوچک در شمال کالیفرنیا در خارج از استاکتون بود. به گفته همسر گوکی، روندا، در طول طوفان زمستانی در دسامبر، گوکی کامیون کمپرسی را به وسیله نقلیه شخصی خود عقب انداخت و باعث خسارت شد.

    ظاهراً بیمه گوکی این خسارت را پوشش نمی‌دهد، زیرا مدتی بعد، او بابت خسارت 3600 دلاری به وسیله نقلیه‌اش – وسیله نقلیه‌ای که هم به نام او و هم به نام همسرش بود – به شهرداری درخواست داد. او حتی در شهر اعتراف کرد که تصادف تقصیر او بوده است، با این حال هنوز ادعای خود را مطرح کرده است. اجازه دهید تکرار کنم که اگر متوجه نشدید اینجا چه اتفاقی می‌افتد: این مرد با یک کامیون شهری که در حال رانندگی بود به وسیله نقلیه خود بازگشت و انتظار داشت که شهر هزینه خسارت را بپردازد. بهتر می شود.

    البته شهر به دلایل واضح این ادعا را رد کرد: شما نمی توانید از خودتان شکایت کنید. بنابراین، روندا گوکی با فکر اینکه او باهوش است یا چیزی شبیه به این بود، تصمیم گرفت ادعای دیگری کند، اما این بار این ادعا فقط نام او بود، نه همسرش. دلیل او این بود که شهر ادعای شوهرش را رد کرد زیرا او عامل حادثه بود. قرار دادن نام او در یک ادعای جدید «تضاد منافع ادعایی شوهرش» را از بین می‌برد لودی نیوز شرح داده شده. او همچنین مبلغ خسارت را به 4800 دلار افزایش داد. گفتن “من حق دارم از شهر شکایت کنم زیرا وسیله نقلیه شهری به وسیله نقلیه شخصی من آسیب رساند.” او تقریباً تهدیدآمیز ادامه داد. من به خوبی شوهرم نیستم. من حق دریافت وسیله نقلیه جایگزین و بیمه وسیله نقلیه را دارم.» باشه خانم

    البته ادعای او نیز رد شد. استیو شوابائر، دادستان شهر لودی، اساساً گفت که این ادعا احمقانه است، به خصوص که کورتیس در ابتدا اعتراف کرده بود که او مسئول این حادثه بوده است. و به یاد داشته باشید، کالیفرنیا یک ایالت دارایی اجتماعی است. آنچه مال من است مال توست و اینها. شوابائر به این موضوع اشاره کرد NBC News به هنگام.

    شما می توانید از همسرتان برای طلاق شکایت کنید، اما نمی توانید از همسرتان به دلیل قصور شکایت کنید. آنها طبق قانون کالیفرنیا یک زوج متاهل هستند. آنها یک موجودیت هستند. این آسیب به اموال جامعه است.

    بنابراین اگر زمانی آنقدر خود را بی‌کفایت و حق دارید که سعی می‌کنید از خود شکایت کنید تا از شخص دیگری برای پرداخت خسارت وسیله نقلیه‌ای که تماس گرفته‌اید، بخواهید، قبل از انجام این کار دو بار فکر کنید. احتمالاً تقریباً 20 سال بعد همچنان در مورد شما صحبت می شود و به آن می خندند.

  • Environmentally Friendly Tesla Is Trying To Skirt Austin Pollution Laws

    Tesla very much wants you to think that it is the cleaner alternative to those dirty, polluting gas cars. When you bought a Model S, you were helping save the planet, they said. However, Tesla hasn’t always done the best job complying with local environmental regulations, and according to the Houston Chronicle, it’s using a new state law to get its Texas factory removed from Austin’s environmental authority.

    The factory, which is located outside of Austin, Texas near the city’s airport, was part of the city’s “extraterritorial jurisdiction,” meaning Austin environmental laws still applied. Considering its location on the Colorado River, it makes sense that the city has strong regulations to keep its water clean and prevent flooding. Unlike Austin, Travis County’s environmental regulations are more lax.

    The city has since confirmed to the Houston Chronicle that Tesla did request “for land associated with Tesla’s operations” to be removed from Austin’s extraterritorial jurisdiction and that it met the requirements to do so. “Releasing properties from the ETJ does impact the city and future city residents,” the city said in a statement. “The city of Austin’s environmental regulations are more protective of water resources than unincorporated Travis County.”

    The decision to leave Austin’s ETJ is ironic considering Musk initially claimed the factory would “basically be an ecological paradise – birds in the trees, butterflies, fish in the stream.” As Alexia Leclercq, policy director for People Organized in Defense of Earth and her Resources, told the Houston Chronicle, it’s also consistent with Tesla’s approach to protecting the environment since it began construction on the 2,500-acre facility.

    “They have this pattern of trying to have as few regulations apply to them as possible,” she said, emphasizing that the ecological paradise Musk initially promised is “nowhere to be found.”

    Once removed from Austin’s ETJ, it won’t be a free-for-all for Tesla, though. It will still have to comply with state regulations that limit how much it can pollute the river and the extent to which it can damage nearby wetlands. It is still Texas, though, so good luck with that, Austin.

  • Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    ·

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    The first new Subarus sold in the United States were microscopic kei cars brought over by Malcolm Bricklin in 1968, and they were followed by slightly larger (but still comically tiny) Leones a few years later. Bigger and better-equipped Leones followed during the 1980s, along with the sleek XT sports car. When the XT’s successor appeared here for the 1992 model year, it was named the SVX and it looked wild! Today’s Junkyard Gem is one of those first-year SVXs, found in a Colorado car graveyard.

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    In Japan, the XT and SVX were known as the Alcyone XT and Alcyone SVX, named after the brightest star in the constellation Subaru uses in its logo.

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    The 1988 XT6 was the first Subaru sold here to get a six-cylinder engine, and its SVX successor also had boxer-six power. Some junkyard shopper bought this car’s engine before I arrived, but it was a 3.3-liter DOHC unit rated at 230 horsepower and 228 pound-feet.

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    At the time the SVX was designed, Subaru didn’t have a manual transmission that could handle the 3.3’s output, so every one of these cars came from the factory with a four-speed automatic transmission.

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    These transmissions proved troublesome in the real world, though Subaru eventually made automatics survive reasonably well behind its H6 engines.

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    For 1992 and 1993, all U.S.-market SVXs were equipped with all-wheel-drive; front-wheel-drive versions were available for the 1994 and 1995 model years (after which all Subarus sold here had AWD as standard equipment).

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    The SVX was styled by Giorgetto Giugiaro, and it turned heads (sometimes in admiration, sometimes in confusion) with this window-within-a-window side glass treatment.

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    The SVX was by far the most expensive new Subaru Americans could buy during its 1992-1997 sales run. This car is a top-trim-level LS-L model, so its MSRP would have been $29,250 (about $65,728 in 2024 dollars). Meanwhile, the 1992 Subaru Justy started at just $6,445 ($14,483 after inflation).

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    After SVX sales ceased, Subaru gave up on selling weird cars here and got busy printing money by offering Americans sensible all-wheel-drive machines suitable for commuting and/or camping.

    Junkyard Gem: 1992 Subaru SVX

    This one nearly reached 200,000 miles during its career, which is respectable though nowhere near the mileage of the best-traveled Subaru I’ve documented in a junkyard.

    Tell me how it’ll do in Chicago!

    It can reach speeds in excess of 140 miles per hour … but how important is that with extended urban gridlock and gas at $1.38 a gallon?

    You’d have thought the Alcyone SVX’s home-market TV commercials would have featured screaming tires and roaring engines, but that wasn’t the case.

  • تویوتا لندکروزر 2024، مازراتی گرن کابریو فولگور 2025: هفته معکوس

    ما تویوتا لندکروز 2024 رانده شدیم، مازراتی گرن کابریو فولگور 2025 معرفی شد و مشخصات Lucid Air Grand Touring 2024 منتشر شد. این هفته در معکوس است، درست اینجا در Motor Authority.

    ما تویوتا لندکروز 2024 را سوار شدیم و متوجه شدیم که آن را به جذابیت یکپارچهسازی با سیستمعامل تغییر می دهد. پلاک نمادین به عنوان یک آفرود کوچکتر، ارزان تر، متمرکزتر با پیشرانه هیبریدی بازمی گردد. مجموعه ای متفاوت از خریداران را نسبت به قبل هدف قرار می دهد.

    فورد شصتمین سالگرد موستانگ را جشن گرفت که شامل اعلامیه هایی درباره بسته 60 سالگی، طراحی جدید خوشه سنج دیجیتال دهه 1960 برای مدل های 2024 و مرکز تجربی جدید موستانگ بود. این خودروساز همچنین نسخه جدیدی از موستانگ را معرفی کرد که در سال 2025 معرفی خواهد شد.

    مازراتی GranCabrio Folgore 2025 معرفی شد. گرند تورر لوکس، معرفی عصر کانورتیبل برقی است. هنگامی که GranCabrio Folgore اواخر امسال عرضه شد، مازراتی گفت که قیمت آن کمی بیش از 200000 دلار خواهد بود و احتمالاً بردی در حدود 250 مایل خواهد داشت.

    آئودی RS 6 E-Tron 2026 برای اولین بار آزمایش خود را در نوربرگ رینگ آغاز کرد. این سدان لوکس با کارایی بالا، مدل پرچمدار سری الکتریکی A6 E-Tron خواهد بود. گلگیرهای عریض تر، دیفیوزر عقب بزرگتر، سیستم تعلیق پایین تر و کیت ترمز بزرگتر همگی از ویژگی های معمول مدل های RS هستند. انتظار می رود اولین نمایش در اواخر امسال یا اوایل سال آینده برگزار شود.

    مدل 2024 Lucid Air Grand Touring با پمپ حرارتی عرضه شد که به سدان برقی کمک می‌کند تا برد بیشتری را در هوای سرد ارائه دهد. موتورها، شیمی باتری و سیستم مدیریت گرما همگی تغییراتی را دریافت می کنند تا اطمینان حاصل شود که انرژی کمتری به عنوان گرما هدر می رود. علیرغم تغییرات انجام شده، ایر گرند تورینگ در قیمت 111400 دلاری که قبلاً اعلام شده بود، شامل هزینه مقصد 1500 دلاری ثابت می ماند.

  • C6 Corvette ZR1 Shows We Didn’t Know How Good We Had It

    ·

    C6 Corvette ZR1 Shows We Didn’t Know How Good We Had It

    John Davis with a C6 Chevy Corvette ZR1

    Does anyone else remember early 2009? Obama was just inaugurated, Circuit City was closing, Bernie Madoff pleaded guilty and I was in the sixth grade looking for my first girlfriend. While all that was happening, though, General Motors was getting ready to launch its masterpiece: the C6 Chevy Corvette ZR1. To me, it is the absolute peak of Corvettes, and now we get a chance to relive its early days through the latest MotorWeek Retro Review.

    Like all MW reviews, this one starts off with our hero John Davis standing outside a copper-colored (remember when every car was copper?) ZR1 using his outside-voice-all-the-time voice. He lays out the specs and highlights: 638 supercharged horsepower, adjustable suspension and Brembo brakes. Babes, this is “as close to a street-legal Corvette race car as you can get.” Luckily, MotorWeek brought the ZR1 to a race track to push it to the limits. That’s right folks, they’re at the Roebling Road Raceway in Bloomingdale, Georgia.

    2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 | Retro Review

    We even get something of a proto-Retro Review in the Retro Review. President Davis talks about all of the other Corvettes they’ve called the best of all time, dating back to the 1990 Corvette ZR1. He then declares the 2009 ZR1 the “ultimate production Corvette.”

    From there we get into the C6 ZR1’s iconic hood window thing, which everyone thought was tacky at the time, but I absolutely love. What a motor that lay beneath it: a 6.2-liter supercharged LS9 V8 that put out 638 horsepower and 604 lb-ft of torque all routed through a six-speed manual transmission. Put those things together and you get a 3.5 second 0-60 time. These numbers are strong today, so 15 years ago they were pretty much out of this world. At the time, the ZR1 apparently set the fastest lap record around Roebling Road ever tested by MotorWeek. It beat out all sorts of high-end sports cars, and even the Ferrari Enzo, for the crown. Despite all that power and performance, Davis said the ZR1 is still the easiest-to-drive high-performance car to date “bar none.” Impressive stuff.

    I have always loved the C6 in general, but the ZR1 – for obvious reasons – has always been my very favorite. I’m just glad to see that THE John Davis agrees.